Source: Hammond, Zaretta. Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain.
Connecting to children's culture and teaching in ways that taps into culture can scaffold student learning efforts. This isn't new. Bilingual/ESL teachers have been doing this for awhile (more here). These connections help students access rigorous curriculum and develop higher-level academic skills.
This is their schema.
Response: "Mediate learning through culturally responsive teaching."
Instruction is culturally mediated when it incorporates and integrates diverse ways of knowing, understanding, and representing information. Instruction and learning take place in an environment that encourages multicultural viewpoints and allows for inclusion of knowledge that is relevant to the students.
rooted in learning theory and cognitive science
helps students build intellective (a.k.a. "fluid") capacity
Intellective capacity is the increased power the brain creates to process complex info effectively
The CRT teacher assists students in processing what they are learning. They do this by:
mediating student learning (based on what they know about how the brain learns and students' cultural models)
Outlining processess, strategies, tactics, tools for engaging students in high-leverage social and instructional activities that over time build HOTS
Culture refers to a dynamic system of social values, cognitive cods, behavioral standards, worldviews, and beliefs used to give order and meaning to our own lives as well as the lives of others (Delgado-Gaitain & Trueba, 1991 as cited by Geneva Gay)
Teachers carry into the classroom their personal cultural background. They perceive students, all of whom are cultural agents, with inevitable prejudice and preconception. Students likewise come to school with personal cultural backgrounds that influence their perceptions of teachers, other students, and the school itself. Together students and teachers construct, mostly without being conscious of doing it, an environment of meanings enacted in individual and group behaviors, of conflict and accommodation, rejection and acceptance, alienation and withdrawal. (George and Louise Spindler (1994))
McCarty, Wallace, Lynch, and Benally (1991) found that the image of Navajo children as silent and passive students was totally destroyed by teaching that connected school learning with cultural backgrounds and lived experiences. When their social experiences were incorporated into curriculum and instruction, and their cultural and linguistic resources were used to solve academic problems, the Navajo students became physically energized, intellectually engaged, and verbally fluent in the classroom.
Boggs, Watson-Gegeo, and McMillen (1985), Tharp and Gallimore (1988), and Au (1993) report similar results from using culturally familiar content and styles of teaching on the academic achievement of Native Hawaiian students.
Krater, Zeni, and Cason (1994), as well as Lee (1993) have done likewise for African Americans;
Escalante and Dirmann (1990) as well as Sheets (1995a) with Latinos; and
Philips (1983) with students on the Warm Springs Reservation and Greenbaum (1985) with Cherokee elementary school students.
"Matching the contextual conditions for learning to the cultural experiences of the learner increases task engagement and hence increases task performance" (B. Allen & Butler, 1996, p. 317).
Research finds that unconsciously teachers reinforce learned helplessness among low performing student of color
Relationships became so important to our survival, the brain created an entire social engagement system to ensure we stay connected and in good standing with the tribe (Porges, 2011).
Empowerment through validation is a critical feature of culturally responsive teaching because it helps restore students' sense of hope (Ladson-Billings, 2009)
Children learn about themselves and the world around them within the context of culture (Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory at Brown University, 2002).
Students from minority cultures may feel pressured to disavow themselves of their cultural beliefs and norms in order to assimilate into the majority culture. This, however, can interfere with their emotional and cognitive development and result in school failure (Sheets, 1999). (source)
"According to education researchers Hattie and Timperley (2007), feedback is one of the most powerful tools we have to improve learning. The brain needs feedback or it will keep doing the same thing over and over even if that move doesn't result in improved skill or performance. The very act of reviewing and applying feedback stimulates the growth of neurons and dendrites in the brain. This action grows more grey matter,"
How have I enjoyed privilege over other groups, especially those that I serve in my school?
Am I aligning my discussions and items at staff meetings with equity?
Do I leverage school resources in ways that center the needs of minoritized students?
How am I including parent (or caregiver) voice in the governing and policy making at the school?
Am I hiring a staff that is consistent with community demographics and who are willing to be self-reflective around issues of oppression?
What are the ways that I routinely and systematically ask the questions in this table (and others like them)?